Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:04
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Star Bassist Carol Kaye rejects Rock & Roll Hall of Fame honor - NPR
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Listen to the eerie sounds of Mars recorded by a NASA rover - Mashable
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Random Eagles notes: Bryce Huff trade perhaps signals some confidence in Azeez Ojulari - PhillyVoice
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why are Indians so influenced by the Western culture, when the Indian tradition has so much to give?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What do you think about wearing sheer pantyhose?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Cloudy skies can’t dim joy as thousands fill nation’s capital for World Pride parade - AP News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.